Despite phone operators and governments being fully aware of their irrelevance to their intended purpose operators and governments alike continue to trot out statements like...

O2 says of TETRA/Airwave:
‘The transmitter operates at very low power overall, Each base radio emits 25 watts so a site with the maximum of four base station radios would be emitting 100 watts - equivalent to a household light bulb. The 17Hz component is so small - much less than half a percent of the total emission - that it is around 8 million times below the ICNIRP public threshold when standing 50m away from the base of the transmitter.

Statements like this are designed to throw concerned individuals of the scent of the problem and the floored ICNIRP guidelines help massively with this and so the guidelines are not investigated as they should be for their relevance, instead their credibility is falsely fortified by the governments and operators reverence for them.

Out of interest here’s how the guidelines (ICNIRP are the top one) compares with the rest of the world

So then the allowable limits in this country for a transceiver is up to 4500 times higher than many other parts of the world but that doesn't’t actually matter that much if the measurement you are making is irrelevant

ICNIRP measures heating effects from the transceivers when the problem lies not with the emissions heating the body but interfering with its bio chemistry in many ways

There is very little doubt that transceivers reduce Melatonin production in homes were the beam falls on peoples sleeping area...what’s that got to do with heating effects?

There is very little doubt that transceivers increase nitric oxide levels in human blood causing free radicals and reducing serotonin levels...What’s that got to do with heating effects?

There is very little doubt that transceivers interfere with peoples sleep patterns...What’s that got to do with heating effects?

The list of problems caused by living under a beam from a phone mast is huge see our symptoms page you wont find any that are relevant to being cooked in a microwave

SAR

It’s the same story as ICNIRP a completely irrelevant measuring system based on heating effects that again allows governments and operators alike to allay fears of brain tumors etc again... what’s that got to do with heating effects?

My favorite analogy is if cigarettes produced exactly the same characteristics when lit and being smoked even if the end didn't’t get hot enough to burn you would they be safe?  Answer no and neither is a phone or phone mast just because it doesn't’t cook you.